HOW TO USE THE POWER OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS AND INFORMAL DISCOVERY DEMAND LETTERS (QWR, DEBT VALIDATION LETTER, ERIR, EXT) TO STOP FORECLOSURE AND  MORTGAGE FRAUD

Here is some information provided by Attorney Neil Garfield on this subject originally posted at https://livinglies.me/2019/04/25/how-to-read-responses-from-the-alleged-servicer/
So here is a case in which the homeowner followed by advice and did send a complaint to the AG office. Bayview responds on behalf of an unknown creditor, a previous servicer (Quality Loan Service) whose default notice and affidavit of service are obviously fabrications using imaging technology. They didn’t notify the borrower of impending foreclosure they simply made up the documents after they initiated foreclosure to justify having done it. In most cases, borrowers don’t even challenge this. But here the borrower is challenging and in so doing she seeks to set the clock back to zero.
*
It says the letter is in response to your letter. And it recites the specific requests. It identifies Bayview as a debt collector which means, by definition, that it is not a creditor. This is significant because contrary to the requirement of statute the beneficiary is never identified although the space where a beneficiary should be named is filled in with Bayview’s name. A follow up complaint with the Division of Financial Services is warranted.
*
Ryan Fortenbury no doubt has nothing to do with actual compliance but rather is in charge of the illusion of compliance. He might be a witness who could reveal, reluctantly, that the documents were fabricated or at least that he has no idea how the documents were produced. His signature is bizarre leading me to believe that either it is a stamp or that it is a special signature used for this purpose only that he can later disclaim.
*
There is a copy of a notice of default but there is no statement by anyone that says that the copy provided is a copy of an actual notice that was actually sent. What they are setting up here is a presumption arising from the business records exception to the hearsay rule. In essence what they are going to say is that QLS had this is their records, that those records were turned over to Bayview, that QLS created and maintained the records at or around the time of each event, and that Bayview now claims it to be part of their business records. There is no such statement from QLS, Bayview or anyone else. But this is how they skate by pro se homeowners and foreclosure defense lawyers.
*
Normal business record practices would have a copy that includes the mailing information. Even letters show the mailing information and business records often include copies of the envelope. No presumption of mailing can occur without someone saying that the notice was delivered by the U.S. Postal Service. At this point if they were to make that assertion I would advise contacting the U.S. Postal Inspector and reporting Bayview as having used the name of the USPS as part of a fraudulent scheme.
*
The mailing of the response constitutes the use of the USPS for a fraudulent scheme in my opinion. Hence the fake documents included were also  part of a fraudulent scheme that could be mail fraud. Note that at the end  it says “First Class and Cert. No 71039628594221471421” but it doesn’t say USPS. If you are certain you didn’t receive this then a subpoena or other demand for USPS records regarding the numbers stated on the notice should be made. When they come up empty you have a lock on the facts.
*
Note that at the end of their package they have corroborated what I say herein. They have attached copy of the mailing label of their response. That is normal practice. If they really had sent the notices they would have retained a copy of the mailing label, especially if it was USPS certified mail.
*
On the Foreclosure Loss Mitigation Form the beneficiary is listed as Bayview which is a servicer not a lender or investor. They are reported to have acquired some loans as a debt collector for pennies on the dollar but they are not considered to be an actual owner of the debt (i.e. a creditor) unless they paid for the debt and not just the paper to enforce the liability created by the paper’s existence.
*
Whether Bayview actually prepared any of this documentation is to be determined at a later time. But the documentation shows Bayview is not the beneficiary but the servicer who is managing the loan. Hence the reference to Bayview as beneficiary leaves out disclosure of the beneficiary by filling in the name of a party who is not a beneficiary.
*
The “posting” copy that I have is unsigned and uncorroborated. I believe that both the notice of default and the posting were recently fabricated, copied a few times and then included with their response.
*
Page 2 of the letter says that the loan is due but does not state who the money is owed to or otherwise due. This is intentional. It is designed to conceal the real players who wish to avoid liability for servicing violations and other claims by the borrower.
*
The letter says that Bayview “would like to afford [borrower] every opportunity to be reviewed for all possible alternatives to foreclosure.” This is a standard sentence that says nothing but reveals a lot. Normally, a servicer or any agent would say that they are authorized by the creditor (and they would name the creditor somewhere in the letter) to offer possible alternatives to foreclosure subject to approval by the creditor (or creditor’s agents). Bayview seems to be implying that but they are not saying it. And they don’t mean what they are implying. They have no such authorization and they should be asked about that. How can they have authorization to even say that if they won’t reveal the identity of the creditor?
*
The affidavit of mailing is just a robosigned document. It is executed supposedly by Wai Tang, it is not sworn and it is not notarized. So as far as I know it isn’t an affidavit. This is a fabricated copy of an image created by using on-screen technology in my opinion. The signature is a good example of the illegible signatures used in forgeries and robosigning. I doubt if Wai Tang signed it. AND please notice that it is not signed by Quality Loan Service but supposedly by ID Solutions as agent for Quality Loan Service. This is a device to further distance QLS, Bayview and whoever else was involved from the fabrication of the notice of default and service thereof.
*
I can only find one reference to ID Solutions. It appears to have the skillset and means to create documents on screen that never existed in real life. Hence the “business Records” aspect fo the document is undermined because it wasn’t;t created or maintained by QLS or Bayview but they will say they received a copy of it and as such kept it as a business record. You want to show they  never received such a copy from ID SOLUTIONS or if they did it was at their direction — and hence you want correspondence between QLS and ID Solutions.
ID Solutions, Inc. develops, integrates, and delivers digital identification solutions for criminal, civilian, customer, and employee identification. It offers IDS Core SDK, which are software development kits that provide third party support; IDSearch, an automated fingerprint identification system that allows integration into small and medium-scale system as a biometric back-end via its programmatic interfaces; IDS Clean File System, which is intended for performing cross-comparison of large fingerprint databases; and Wireless Handheld Open identification System that is a mobile biometrics integration platform. The company also provides various solutions, such as national identification, v…
*
The notice of default claims that the owner of the note is Fannie Mae. It does not identify Fannie as a creditor or the owner of the debt. It is true that a presumption arises from “ownership” off the note, but that is only based upon payment and delivery of the note, which I can assure you never happened.
*
Generally references to Fannie are either false or misleading. They are false if Fannie had nothing to do with the origination or acquisition of the loan. If Fannie is claimed to have acquired the note it is usually as Master Trustee for a hidden REMIC Trust name that conceals the investment bank that is using the hidden trust name as a fictitious name (DBA).
*
Typically Fannie pays for the loans using the certificates issued by the investment bank as “REMIC Trust” which are then sold by the investment bank to investors using a conventional Bank name as “Trustee” of the nonexistent trust. The actual owner of the debt was the investment bank but all risk of loss has been sold, effectively dwelling  the debt, to (a) investors who purchased the certificates or (b) investors who are betting on the certificates.
*
There is no statement as to why or how or under what set vicing agreement, document or appointment Bayview is managing or servicing the loan.
*
The reinstatement amount is at best suspect and is probably unsupportable by any standard. The implication  of “reinstatement” is that if Kerrigan pays this amount the money will go to someone who paid value for the loan and therefore the debt would be correspondingly reduced. This is almost certainly not the case here. And there is nothing in any document says that it will.
*
In the absence of fulfilling the criteria of having the creditor declare the default the notice of acceleration and the notice of default are void in addition to the lack of evidence that they were ever served.
*
The signature of Christy Young on the Note of Default is highly suspect. I am not a forensic document examiner but I have seen many documents on which different forensic document examiners have given a score of 9 which means fake. The designation as “assistant secretary” is a giveaway for a robosigned document. The positioning of the signature indicates at least a strong possibility of forgery or an imaged signature in which the person whose signature appears knows nothing of the document or the signature. Since such persons typically are compensated for use of their signature it is not technically an forgery but it is definitely a robosignature if that happened. If so that is evidence of fraud and violations of FRCA, FDCPA, RESPA, TILA etc.
*
You should contest the statement on the Foreclosure Loss Mitigation Form that says that The beneficiary or beneficiary’s agent has contacted the borrower as required under RCW 61.24.031. Unless they can identify the creditor they cannot identify the beneficiary. without identifying the beneficiary, they can’t claim agency. In the absence of all that, they can say that it happened but they haven’t actually said it substantively. It is a facially valid statement which in the context of the statement is meaningless and therefore out of compliance.
*
There is no statement as to how, why and between whom an agreement was reached to transfer servicing from QLS to Bayview. This is because no such agreement exists. They were both acting under the instructions of the investment bank who was moving the named players around to confuse the borrower and anyone representing the borrower.

IF you want to get started laying the groundwork for a state and federal lawsuit using the administrative process and informal discovery process join FRAUD STOPPERS today and you will get all the informal discovery demand letters to overturn the tables on the money-changers and make the banks pay you to go away.

 

SAVE YOUR HOME FROM FORECLOSURE & FIGHT MORTGAGE FRAUD TODAY BY JOINING FRAUD STOPPERS PMA

FRAUD STOPPERS Private Members Association (PMA) includes:

  • A Mortgage Fraud Investigation

  • A U.C.C Mortgage Fraud Report (if applicable)

  • Potential Cause of Action Consultation

  • Informal Discovery Documents: QWR, ERIR, Federal Debt Validation Letters, TILA Rescission Letter, Tort Letter.

  • Federal FDCPA Lawsuit

  • Bankruptcy Package

  • Home Modification Report & Documents

  • 3 SPECIAL BONUS REPORTS

  • Exclusive Access to Members Only Litigation Support Products & Services

  • JOIN NOW AT https://www.fraudstoppers.org/pma/ 

 

How to Respond to a Notice of Default

Now let’s talk about the foreclosure laws as they relate to everybody. If you have received a Notice of Default (NOD) or Notice of Acceleration (NOA), then time is short and you need to do something. And the only thing that will get the banks attention is a lawsuit. If you have an impending sale there are a number of things you can do. If you haven’t done anything concerning the foreclosure process as yet, there are some things you have to do simultaneously.

 

The first thing you want to do is send out a number of letters. Whoever is attempting to foreclosure on you, on that person you should send a debt validation letter (DVL). Often, a debt validation letter (DVL) will stall the foreclosure. Because when a debt validation letter is filed, the lender is obligated by the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act (FDCPA) to validate the debt.

 

A presentment under the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) is defined as a demand for payment on a debt in us dollars. If your sent a presentment (a demand for payment) from anyone, you may dispute the debt with that person, and if you send them a letter stating that you dispute the debt and a demand that the claimant prove up their claim, then the debt collector is required to seize all collection efforts until they have proved up the claim.

 

So if your lender is in the process of foreclosure, and you send them a debt validation letter, they’re going to claim that in this case they are not debt collectors, but in fact they are merely attempting to recover collateral. The courts across the country are split on this issue. Some states say yes they are a debt collector, and some say no they are not a debt collector. For our purpose we don’t care either way, because we’re going to make the claim and by law once the demand is made they must prove up their position either way. The issue that we’ve been making with the lawsuits we’ve been helping people produce is that they are a debt collector until they show that they are not a debt collector. Usually they like to reply with a Rule 12 (motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim), alleging that they are NOT debt collectors and therefore they do not fall under the FDCPA.

 

So the argument that we’re making here is that in order to implement the intent of the legislator (and that intent was to prevent someone with no claim on a debt from collecting on a debt), you are demanding they prove their position.

 

If you have a debt with GMAC and I call you from Joe Blow collections, or send you a letter claiming I’m collecting for GMAC and you need to send all your future payments to me. Well if you send your payments to them and they are not collecting for GMAC the payments you send to them do not extinguish the debt; and that’s in the Uniform Commercial Code.

 

You see the foreclosure mills and the banks agents are trying to squeeze in under that exclusion, and claim that they are not trying to collect money; rather they are attempting to recover property. But in order to recover the property you have to get a notice of intent to foreclose in the form of a notice of default (NOD) and opportunity to cure the default (by paying money). This is stated in the mortgage.

 

Now we are saying that makes you a debt collector. Because the bank is saying you better pay a certain amount in U.S. dollars, or else they will become a collateral collections agent, and take the property as collateral. So the argument you will be making to the court is even if the jurisdiction says that the debt collector, and the foreclosure agent falls under the exclusion, until such time as they prove that they are actually in that position, they fall under the FDCPA.

 

If you get a phone call, you will use the: “Let’s Play a Little Q & A” on them. YOU must take control of the situation.

Write down their name, and the time and date they called. This is very important. (If you can record the conversation it will help you to transcribe to a ledger, the reason for this is that generally a recorded conversation is not admissible in a court room (the Judge will not allow it) however a transcript is admissible with no problem).

  1. What is the name of the company that you work for (where you work)
  2. What is their address
  3. What state are they in
  4. What is the zip code
  5. What is the phone number
  6. What is the name of the creditor (originally claims the debt)
  7. What is their address
  8. What state are they in
  9. What is the zip code
  10. What is their phone number
  11. What is the Account number
  12. What is the amount that you (or they) claim that I owe

 

The purpose of this is that there are certain things they must do during the telephone conversation and the primary one is as follows. The very first thing they must do after identifying themselves is to read you your consumer warning.

This is also referred to the “Mini-Miranda” “This is an attempt to collect a debt and any information obtained will be used for that purpose”.

If they do not inform you of your rights they have violated section § 807 of the DCPA and is a $1,000.00 violation.

On top of that, in your Debt Validation Letter you should request that they only contact you by U.S. Mail. This way each phone call could result in you being paid up to $1,500.00 for each violation of the Federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act 47 U.S.C. § 227.

 

For complete, step by step, instructions on how to deal with Debt Collectors and Creditors, and how to improve your credit score (and make money doing it) you can get the How to Deal with Creditors and the How to Deal with Debt Collectors course(s) at: https://www.fraudstoppers.org/freemoney

Moving along! Think about this, if someone could be excluded from proving their position, just by making the claim that they weren’t a debt collector, and not have to prove it up the claim, then the statute requiring someone’s to prove their position would have no force in fact. In other words the law would be meaningless. So you’re saying that the bank is a debt collector, until they prove they are not. So now the burden of proof shifts to them proving they are not.

 

Either way it does not matter because this is just round one. In your lawsuit you can stipulate that IF they prove up their position you will dismiss this issue.

 

What you’re claiming here is you don’t know who the real holder of the note is, and for good reason. With all this robo-signing, and loan securitization, and transferring these loans, mortgages, and deeds of trust all over the place, you don’t have a clue to who the real holder of the note is. So you don’t know who has the actual authority to perform the foreclosure, so you’re asking that they prove up their position. Until they do this the foreclosure should be halted. Some people have been able to stop the foreclosure for years with this one simple step.

 

Remember your lender or loan servicer sent you a notice of default (NOD) and opportunity to cure; and you just need to make sure that if you send the amount necessary to cure that it will actually cure the debt; and you won’t have somebody coming back next week trying to foreclose again.

 

So the first thing you need to do is send the a good Debt Validation Letter; because when your lender or loan servicer receives it they are essentially statutory estopped from any and all further collection efforts until they answer.

 

After you mail your Debt Validation Letter, if they send you an answer, more than likely it will be a “nonresponsive answer”. They may send you a copy of the deed of trust/mortgage, and maybe a copy of the note (if they have one). But they will not send you the originals that you requested, and they will not make originals available for your inspection, because in all likelihood they do not have them.

 

In fact the Bankers Association testified to the Florida Supreme Court in CASE NO.:09-1460 that “The reason many firms file lost note counts as a standard alternative pleading in the complaint is because the physical document was deliberately eliminated to avoid confusion immediately upon its conversion to an electronic file.”

 

So in order to address that issue in the debt validation letter you demand that they produce the original note for inspection by you; as is your right under Federal law. Now this is governed by Uniform Commercial Code 3-501; and it says that when a creditor sends a presentment to a debtor, and the debtor demands production of the original security instrument, the creditor must make the instrument available for inspection by the debtor. They do not have to give it to you; they just have to show it to you. If they fail to do so, the debtor can cease all payments without dishonor.

 

Now this creates Statutory Estoppel on two different fronts, and it will almost always stop the foreclosure, at least the first time you send them it. It usually takes them a little bit of time to get regrouped. Once they send you this bogus answer they may try to go ahead and start the foreclose process again.

And there are things you can do if and when they do that.

 

But first things first, send the debt validation letters. Then as soon as you can you want to get a suit filed under the Fair Debt Collections Practice Act (FDCPA). When you send in your Debt Validation Letter (DVL) and then file suit for the same purpose. File suit demanding that the person claiming authority to foreclosure prove up their position; demand that they prove they are actually a bonafide agent for the true holder of the note.

 

Now this could be a big problem for the bank. The bank may actually be, or whoever the alleged principal for the agent is, may actually be the true holder of the note. But their problem is, in the last 13 years or so, after the repeal of the Glass Steagall Act and the repeal of the prohibition against derivatives, it sort of unleashed the money changers on us and they got themselves into such a glut of swallowing all of the equity of this country, that they just didn’t take care of business. They didn’t take care of the bookkeeping very well and usually they cannot legally prove up their position.

 

So when you file suit for this, and we’ve done a bunch of them, you have to understand that the courts are absolutely totally corrupt. They will dismiss your case no matter what, even if you have an attorney. Because the banks have money and power, and they can apply political pressure. And don’t forget that some of the federal judges are dirty rotten scoundrels. Maybe they can’t help it, maybe their position depend on them being dirty rotten scoundrels, but in the end…..they’re dirty rotten scoundrels; and they will rule against the Pro Se at every turn. So you have to expect that, and be prepared for that.

 

But don’t worry because the How to Win in Court Course will teach you how to argue your case, for the record, so you can win on appeal.

 

And keep in mind that you have some things you can do as Pro Se to tilt the scales of justice in your favor. As a Pro Se you don’t have to worry about that scoundrel judge pulling your bar card, because you don’t have one! Generally you don’t have to worry about the judge sanctioning you, because for the most part, the things that will get someone sanctioned only apply to lawyers. As long as you don’t curse the judge out, and you put on the appearance of civility, they’ll have no way to sanction you.

 

When you start filing judicial conduct complaints against a judge every time they squeak, every time they do something to deserve it, they can do nothing to stop you. If you file a judicial conduct complaint against the judge, and the judge says one word to you, that’s obstruction of justice and tampering with a witness and that can get them into big trouble real fast.

 

The same goes for bar grievances against attorneys. Bar grievances can affect attorney’s malpractice insurance. So these are just a few of the things that you can do to them as a Pro Se, which lawyers can’t do. If you have a lawyer, they can’t do any of these things, because if they do anything the judge doesn’t like, the judge can jerk their bar card away, almost at whim. But you’ll have to worry about that, and we will show you how to take some actions that will make up for a lot of these problems we have with corrupt judges and courts. I’m hoping that if we can get enough people doing this, that we can put enough pressure on the judges, that they will stop playing these shenanigans, in order to get us to stop filing judicial conduct complaints against them every time they turn around. But that is a discussion for another day.

 

Once you file your lawsuit you can expect a rule of 12 motion (dismiss for failure to stay to claim); and they will have 21 days to file that answer. So if you’re facing foreclosure they generally have to give you 21 days notice; and they generally time it so it’s exactly 21 days notice. So you will want to file a federal (or state) lawsuit fast, and that will almost certainly stop the sale.

 

Now it may NOT statutorily stop the sale. The only thing you can do to legally stop the bank from foreclosing on your property is to get a court order; like a temporary restraining order signed by a judge. Or you can also file for bankruptcy to temporarily stop the sale!

 

However, once you sue them, the reality is that win lose or draw, you’ll probably come out ahead because civil litigation takes time; and time is money!

 

So once you file an action against them, if the bank goes ahead and forecloses on the property while the litigation is going on, they could have opened themselves up for even more damages. Plus nobody in their right mind would purchase the property; because there would be a Lis Pendens filed against the property; and we’ll show you how to file a Lis Pendens (Latin for “suit pending”) later.

 

So after you mail your debt validation letter, you want to go to the local register of deeds (or your county recorder of deeds office) and get a copy of every document that has been filed in the county records for your property, from the date you purchased the property to present.

 

You’ll look for a deed of trust, or a mortgage, depending on what state you live in. If you live in a judicial state you have a mortgage. If you live in a non-judicial state you have a deed of trust.

 

If you are not sure if your state is a judicial or non-judicial, here is a list: https://www.fraudstoppers.org/foreclosure-laws-by-state/

 

You should get a copy of every page of each document recorded against your properties chain of title, from the time you purchased the home until present. Print the Search Results, with your name as GRANTOR and GRANTEE, and your wife’s name as GRANTOR and GRANTEE, then search the property address, and print the search results.

 

Take your camera and take a picture of every page starting with the index or the cover page of your deed record file and save each picture by:

Yr-mo-day, YOUR LAST NAME, Name of Doc, Page of Doc:

[Example: 2013-07-04, Smith, Original Deed of Trust, 17 Pages]

You should end up with copies of your Original Warranty Deed, Deed of Trust (or Mortgage, as it is called in some states).

 

While looking at the Deed of Trust or Mortgage, click on the button or link for “RELATED DOCUMENTS” and print the search results, then get a copy of any “Assignments of Deed of Trust or Mortgage” and any “Releases of Liens”,” Appointments of Substitute Trustees”, “Trustee Deeds”, and Law Firm Letters, like Default or Acceleration Letters from Attorneys who are hired to collect the debts from you.

 

Get a copy of everything in the file to the present date. You’ll also look for an assignment of substitute of trustee, an appointment of the note, and an appointment of the deed of trust or mortgage.

 

You may be able to get free copies of your county recorder of deeds documents online. Here is some information on how to do that: https://www.fraudstoppers.org/how-to-get-free-online-copies-of-your-county-recorder-of-deeds-land-record-documents/

 

These are the primary documents you’ll look for. And you may see a notice of default, or notice of intent to foreclose. Basically you want to get a copy of every document filed against your property from the time you purchased it until the present.

 

Then once you get a copy of these documents look at the authentication, which is the notary. Documents filed in the county record are not self authenticating. Since these documents are filed by someone that just comes down to the court, or hands it to the court, or they send it by mail, someone has to sign the document for it to be valid.

 

An authentication is when a person goes before someone who is authorized to do this, authorized to verify that the person who is claiming to sign the document, is in fact the person they claim to be. Essentially that’s all the authentication is. The notary will authenticate that this person came before me, and either I knew them personally or they identified themselves to me by this method; and I made the determination that this person is who they say they are.

 

This is one of the biggest areas of fraud in the whole foreclosure issue and it is absolutely the dumbest place to commit fraud. It’s arrogance beyond belief, its total reckless disregard for our laws and our courts. To file a document with a fraudulent identification is a felony; and the banksters have filed millions of them!

If you remember back to the 60 Minutes’ episode The Next Housing Shock a young guy got on television and bragged that he could sign Linda Green’s name, something like 360 times an hour. Think about it, in just one hour he committed enough felonies to put him in a federal penitentiary for several life sentences. This guy was no rocket scientist, but he could write fast! And the notaries, it’s a relatively minor thing, and its standard business procedure. But these guys are cranking out foreclosures so fast that having to wait for a notary, or having to wait for a notary to sit across the table from you as your signing these documents, and take the time to fill out their ledger and have you sign the ledger, while that’s inconvenient, and it’s not efficient.

 

So the foreclosure mills will hire somebody, at the entry level position who doesn’t know anything, and they come to them and say: “Hey we need a notary, and if you want to be a notary we can pay for your application fee, and your bond, and everything you need like your stamp and your ledger, and we’ll make you a notary.” And the new entry level clerk says “wonderful, I’ll be a notary”. And then the company comes to them with a big stack of documents and says “here you go, we need you to notarize these for us.” And generally this is a law firm, so the entry level clerk believes that this must be legal, and they do what there told and they notarize the stack of fraudulent documents. So now when the foreclosing agency needs a notarized document they just pull one off the shelf and fill it out.

 

What the notary is required to do in a number of states is to keep a sequential ledger. Anybody who has taken a document to get it notarized will recognize the procedure. You sign your document in front of the notary, after you have identified yourself to the notary, and then the notary will fill out some stuff on this ledger, and turn around and have you sign it. And now they even have a fingerprint pad where they will have you put your fingerprint or thumbprint on it. And that’s so if anyone ever has a question about the authentication, the notary can prove up the authentication.

 

Well the first thing you need to do is to pull every notary name off of every document that’s been filed in the county records office against your house, and send them a letter requesting a copy of their sequential ledger, from the day before to the day after any authentication appears in the record.  And we suggest that you do not send it yourself. Have someone you know send it. And be sure to send its certified mail. Anything that you cannot conclusively prove that you sent and was received will go into the trash. Now that may not be right, but that’s the way it works. So always send all of your legal correspondences Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested!

 

The Post Office will give you a tracking number. Write that tracking number on the top of your letters & correspondences. Make a copy of the letter with the tracking number written on the top, then mail the letter. This provides you proof when they sign for the letter, and what the substance of the letter was.

 

You may get an answer back from them, but it will most likely be non-responsive.  If they send you an answer and it is not the sequential ledger, or if the record shows that the ledger is incomplete, then the answer is nonresponsive! To date, we have yet to receive a single responsive answer to this request. If you don’t receive a responsive answer, you will have a valid reason to believe that the authentication is invalid.

 

Now there is one particular notary that most people will have a question about, and that’s the one on the deed of trust or the mortgage. When you signed that at closing there was a notary sitting at the table across from you, as a rule. There’s required to be, but not always.  Sometimes the lender will come to your house and have you fill out all the documents at your kitchen table. Well, that’s not quite legal because that deed of trust or mortgage must be authenticated; because that document is intended to be filed with the county register. And documents filed at the county register or are not self authenticating and they must be authenticated by a notary.

 

If there was no notary, than the document is not authenticated; but if there was a notary,   you have to ask “was that a notary?” Because you don’t really know, they look like notaries and they act like notaries; but what we have found in sending these letters out, is that they are not necessarily notaries. Or even if they were notaries often they’re not notaries any longer. And when a notary cases to be a notary, the notary is required to send their substantial ledger to the clerk of the court, or county clerk.  We’ve never found the county clerk who has one.

 

What we have found more often than I would have expected, is that we send a request from a notary on the deed of trust, and would get a letter back saying that our letter is undeliverable. So we contact the secretary of state who oversees notaries and who issues the notary authority and we asked the secretary of state for an address on the notary; and the secretary states because we don’t know who this person is. Now we are not exactly sure what is going on here. It may be that once a notaries’ commission expires, and it hasn’t been renewed, the secretary state may not maintain information on them. We don’t know if that’s the case or not, or if the secretary of state never had any information on the person. We don’t know what the deal is!

 

But what we do know is that the secretary of state says to us, “we don’t know anything about this person, and they’re not a notary, and we don’t have any record of them.” And for us, that works GREAT! We can live with that; because that creates an adverse inference that whoever sat across from us at the closing table, posing as a notary, was not in fact a notary.

 

Now maybe they were, but there’s no evidence to indicate that. So you can go back to the court, and say that you have reason to believe, and you do believe, that this document was never properly authenticated, and that the acknowledgement on the document was fraudulent, and you ask that the document be stricken from the record. Now what the court is likely to come back and say is: “well did you sign it?” To which you should reply: “Objection relevance!”

 

It’s irrelevant because the document must be authenticated, or proven, and it is not. You do not know if that is precisely the document that you signed at closing. Your bank may have made up another one. You can never know what the document your bank is reporting to have is, unless they bring you the original; and they will NEVER do that!

 

But you raise the issue so that if you can get the deed of trust, or mortgage, to be declared by the judge to be of no force and effect; your bank will have a real big problem! But generally the one that we can go after is not good deed of trust, or mortgage, in this particular regard. There are other places to go after the validity of the deed of trust, or mortgage.

 

But for now the documents that were really looking for, is the assignment of substitute trustee and the assignment of deed of trust. Now that one, we don’t know who signed at one, and this is the issue that goes to robo-signers. The problem with going to the court and accusing somebody being robo-signers, is you can go to the judge and say this person is a robo-signer and his name is splattered all over the Internet. And the judge is going to say “so, what does that have to do with this issue? Just because he’s accused of being a robo-signer doesn’t mean he didn’t have authority to sign this documentWhat evidence do you have to show that he did not have authority to sign this document?”

 

To which you can reply while Your Honor, this guy is a robo-signer and his name is all over the Internet. So I sent a letter to the company, for whom this person acted as an agent, and I requested evidence of the power of attorney for this person, and on these letters we have never received a responsive answer yet.

 

So after you complete the above mention step, you can then go to the court and say your Honor, I think this guy is a robo-signer (his name is splattered all over the internet), so I sent a letter to the company for whom he signed, asking them for proof of power of attorney, and I didn’t get any response. And this creates the adverse inference that the guy did not have power of attorney.

 

Furthermore, you’ve looked in the county record and expected to find evidence of power of attorney, as is required by law for anyone who files this type of document, that is specifically referenced by our state law, and I did not find any such evidence that he had  power  of attorney.

 

This creates a prima fascia case for this document being insufficient for filing in the record and I ask the court to rule that it’s insufficient, and is therefore void and of no force and effect.

 

This is all you want the judge to rule on at this time, and this is where you’re filing a petition for declaratory judgment. You’re not asking for any damages, at this time. You’re only asking that the judge make a declaration; and the only declaration we want the judge to make is that this document, as it exist by looking at the four corners, is insufficient for filing. Doing these steps as soon as possible can cause big problems for your bank and their foreclosure efforts.

 

Remember these steps are only the start to defeating your fraudulent mortgage or foreclosure. The banks have paid lobbyist to help Congress pass laws that benefit the banks and their foreclosure efforts, so you will need to do more to reach a successful outcome and a happy ending.

 

For more information on what you should do if you receive a notice of default or foreclosure complaint watch this video: https://www.fraudstoppers.org/how-to-respond-to-a-notice-of-default-or-foreclosure-complaint

 

 

And remember never give up on your piece of the American dream because you may have options available to gain the remedy that you deserve!

 

To your victory!

Referral Affiliate Video

FRAUD STOPPERS Referral Affiliate Programs

FRAUD STOPPERS Referral Affiliate Programs

Stop Foreclosure & Mortgage Fraud Fast, Sue the Banks & Make Money Helping Others Do the Same

Stop Foreclosure & Mortgage Fraud Fast Fraud Stoppers

Stop Foreclosure & Mortgage Fraud Fast Fraud Stoppers

Free Foreclosure EBook

FRAUD STOPPERS Foreclosure Traps Pitfalls and Swindles

FRAUD STOPPERS Foreclosure Traps Pitfalls and Swindles

JOIN FRAUD STOPPERS PMA

How to Win in Court

Fraud Stoppers How to Win in Court

Credit Repair

FRAUD STOPPERS Credit Repair

Bloomberg Securitization Audits

securitized table funded loans

securitized table funded loans

Mortgage Calculator

Loan Calculator Mortgage Calculator
Mortgage CalculatorLoan CalculatorLoan Calculator

$

years

%

Social Media Buttons

VISIT US AT

face book youtubeg+ twitter

American Justice League

Rule of Law Radio

Rule of Law Radio

Pro Bono Attorneys

Process Service

Blog

FRAUD STOPPERS PMA Mortgage Foreclosure Defense Blog

 

 

For information on foreclosure defense call us at 800-459-1215. We offer litigation support, admissible evidence, expert witness testimony, education, training, and support in all 50 states to attorneys and pro se homeowners.

 

 

 

DON'T LET THE BANKS TRICK YOU!

Get the FACTS & Evidence to win the legal remedy that you deserve today.

get-started-now

 

 

 

FRAUD STOPPERS Can Help You Stop Foreclosure and Mortgage Fraud

If you or anyone you know is facing foreclosure, or has already lost a property to foreclosure, and want to sue for mortgage fraudforeclosure fraud, wrongful foreclosure, or quiet title to your home FRAUD STOPPERS PMA can help you save time and money and increase your odds of success getting the legal remedy that you deserve. If you have received a Notice of Default (NOD) or a Foreclosure Notice (Foreclosure Complaint) and you want to know how to respond to the Notice of Default (NOD) or a Foreclosure Notice (Foreclosure Complaint) join FRAUD STOPPERS PMA today because FRAUD STOPPERS has a proven system to help you fight to save your home from foreclosure and sue for mortgage fraud. FRAUD STOPPERS turnkey Quiet Title Lawsuit package or Wrongful Foreclosure Lawsuit package includes a court ready complaint (petition for damages), Bloomberg Securitization Audit, Expert Witness Affidavit, Application for Temporary Restraining Order (to stop a foreclosure sale or stop an eviction), Lis Pendens (to cloud the marketability of the title to the real property), and Pro Se legal education material that can show you how to win a Quiet Title Lawsuit or win a Wrongful Foreclosure Lawsuit. This entire court ready Quiet Title Lawsuit Package or Wrongful Foreclosure Lawsuit Package can help you save money in legal fees and help you increase your odds of success. Join FRAUD STOPPERS PMA today and get mortgage fraud analysis and the facts and evidence you need to get the legal remedy you deserve at www.fraudstopper.org/pma

 

 

FRAUD STOPPERS PMA

Feel free to connect with us . . .

Address: Birch Tree MO 65438
Phone: 800-459-1215
Email: Info@FraudStoppers.org

 

 

 

Fraud Stoppers Logo

DISCLOSURE: NOTICE OF Copyright © 2019  FRAUD STOPPERS, FRAUD STOPPERS PMA. Disclaimer: Any information or answers are provided for informational purposes only, does not constitute legal advice, and does not create PMA-Member relationship. THIS SITE IS NOT INTENDED TO BE MISCONSTRUED AS LEGAL ADVICE. Legal Information is NOT Legal Advice: This site provides “information” that is only designed to help users safely cope with their own general legal needs. Legal information is NOT the same as legal advice — the application of law to an individual’s specific circumstances. FRAUD STOPPERS is a National Private Members Association (PMA). PLEASE TAKE NOTICE OF THE FOLLOWING MARS Disclosure[s] 12 C.F.R. 1015.: (1) FRAUD STOPPERS PMA is NOT Affiliated with any Government Agency or Any Bank Lender; (2) Even if YOU Accept any of  FRAUD STOPPERS PMA Products or Services Your Lender May Choose to NOT Change Your Loan.  FRAUD STOPPERS products and services are only available to Active Members of the FRAUD STOPPERS PRIVATE MEMBERS ASSOCIATION. To join FRAUD STOPPERS PMA click here: https://www.fraudstoppers.org/members-only/

 

 

Please follow and like us:
Visit Us
Follow Me
Tweet
close

Enjoy this blog? Please spread the word :)

Visit Us
Follow Me
Tweet