Allowing 5 million families to be evicted when moratoriums end, is not a solution. It’s problem

by Neil Garfield

Allowing 5 million people to be evicted when moratoriums end, is not a solution. It’s problem.
Here is the solution for any landlord that owns rental property and any homeowner living in their homestead, where the property is subject to a recorded lien (mortgage or deed of trust).

1. Require all current servicers AND “successors” of “lenders” to prove they paid value for the underlying obligation. By that, I mean a canceled check or wire transfer confirmation.

2. For those who can produce that proof in a form and with content that can be independently confirmed, they should be allowed to continue with foreclosure. The percentage of cases in which this will be true is going to be around 1-2% of all liens, at most.

3. For those who can’t produce that proof, they have no way of legally enforcing any claim to administer, collect or enforce any presumed debt of any property owner.

4. But a simplified way of reforming the “loan agreement” to include all aspects of the deal and not just the parts that the “borrowers” and “investors” were told about, would produce settlements that could be passed on to both the property owners and the tenants.

5. Those settlements would reduce the profits of investment banks without eliminating them.

6. Losses would be incurred by the investment banks who are still holding onto trillions of dollars of illicit gains from false claims of securitization — in which securities of all types, manner, shapes, and sizes were issued under false pretenses. Some losses would be realized by investors who were fooled into these treacherous deals. [“Securitization” without the sale of assets to investors is a practical and legal nullity].

7. Practically nobody would go out of business although threats of the apocalypse will ring through the hallways of congress etc.

8. Most tenants would be able to resume payments shortly.

9. Most homeowners would restart their payment schedule under a new loan agreement settlement.

10. Not a single dollar of taxpayer money would need to be spent.

11. The result would stimulate the economy by relieving a huge amount of false debt from the economy.

12. Business activities would increase across the board.

13. Tax revenues would go up.

14. The federal deficit would decline.

15. The current practice of securitization (appointing a virtual creditor) would become officially legal — as long as there was adequate disclosure along the lines required by lending statutes and securities laws and regulations.

The only way to disagree with this somewhat simple plan is to presume that the number of persons who claim to be lienholders who can presently claim ownership of the lien, debt, note, or mortgage through payment of value for the underlying obligation (see Article 9 §203 UCC), would be very high. Really? Prove it!



Get In Touch

Phone / Fax

Phone: 800-459-1215

Fax: 844-318-3941


Hours: 24/7/365


Send A Message


Fraud Stoppers Logo

THIS SITE IS NOT INTENDED TO BE MISCONSTRUED AS LEGAL ADVICE. FRAUD STOPPERS is a Private Members Association PMA. FRAUD STOPPERS PMA is NOT a law firm, non-profit organization, or government agency.  FRAUD STOPPERS PMA does not operate in the public sector. Although this website is visible to the public  FRAUD STOPPERS PMA does not intend for any information contained in this website to be considered as legal advise.

The information about Foreclosure law and other legal information provided on this website does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal advice; instead, all information, content, and materials available on this site are for general informational purposes only.  Information on this website may not constitute the most up-to-date legal or other information.  This website contains links to other third-party websites.  Such links are only for the convenience of the reader, user or browser; FRAUD STOPPERS and its members do not recommend or endorse the contents of the third-party sites.

Readers of this website should contact their attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular legal matter.  No reader, user, or browser of this site should act or refrain from acting on the basis of information on this site without first seeking legal advice from counsel in the relevant jurisdiction.  Only your individual attorney can provide assurances that the information contained herein – and your interpretation of it – is applicable or appropriate to your particular situation.  Use of, and access to, this website or any of the links or resources contained within the site do not create an attorney-client relationship between the reader, user, or browser and website authors, contributors, contributing law firms, or committee members and their respective employers. This site provides “information” about the law and is only designed to help users safely cope with their own legal needs. But legal information is not the same as legal advice — the application of law to an individual’s specific circumstances.

The views expressed at, or through, this site are those of the individual authors writing in their individual capacities only – not those of their respective employers, FRAUD STOPPERS, or committee/task force as a whole.  All liability with respect to actions taken or not taken based on the contents of this site are hereby expressly disclaimed.  The content on this posting is provided “as is;” no representations are made that the content is error-free.

For instant access to an affordable local competent attorney click here


Spread the love